{"id":5940,"date":"2026-04-03T11:44:06","date_gmt":"2026-04-03T08:44:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=5940"},"modified":"2026-04-03T11:44:06","modified_gmt":"2026-04-03T08:44:06","slug":"curtea-de-apel-bucuresti-formuleaza-o-trimitere-privind-interpretarea-art-19-tue-mecanisme-interne-de-unificare-a-practicii-judiciare-si-dreptul-ue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=5940","title":{"rendered":"Curtea de Apel Bucure\u0219ti formuleaz\u0103 o trimitere privind interpretarea art. 19 TUE -mecanisme interne de unificare a practicii judiciare \u0219i dreptul UE"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>Curtea de Apel Bucure\u0219ti formuleaz\u0103 o trimitere privind interpretarea art. 19 TUE -mecanisme interne de unificare a practicii judiciare \u0219i dreptul UE, care potrivit \u00eencheierii din 26 martie 2026 are urm\u0103torul cuprins:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201dArticolul 19 alineatul (1) al doilea paragraf TUE trebuie interpretat \u00een sensul c\u0103 se opune sau nu ca dreptul na\u021bional s\u0103 prevad\u0103 un mecanism intern \u00een temeiul c\u0103ruia o solu\u021bie votat\u0103 cu majoritate \u00eentr-o \u0219edin\u021b\u0103 de unificare a practicii judiciare desf\u0103\u0219urat\u0103 la curtea de apel se impune tuturor judec\u0103torilor din raza teritorial\u0103 a acesteia ca practic\u0103 unitar\u0103, \u00een baza unei proceduri tehnice stabilite de Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii, \u00een condi\u021biile \u00een care aceast\u0103 \u0219edin\u021b\u0103 de unificare include doar judec\u0103tori desemna\u021bi de pre\u0219edin\u021bii instan\u021belor din raza teritorial\u0103 la propunerea pre\u0219edin\u021bilor sec\u021biilor, pe fiecare materie, dup\u0103 consultarea vicepre\u0219edintelui cur\u021bii de apel, ce pot fi al\u021bi judec\u0103tori dec\u00e2t acei care au solu\u021bionat sau solu\u021bioneaz\u0103 efectiv dosarele \u00een care s-a ridicat problema de jurispruden\u021b\u0103 neunitar\u0103, inclusiv judec\u0103tori ce pot fi nespecializa\u021bi \u00een materia \u00een care se voteaz\u0103, \u00een fa\u021ba c\u0103rora p\u0103r\u021bile nu au posibilitatea de a-\u0219i sus\u021bine argumentele, \u00een contextul \u00een care nerespectarea regulamentelor Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii poate reprezenta abatere disciplinar\u0103?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.1. Instanta na\u021bional\u0103 \u2013 Curtea de Apel Bucure\u0219ti<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.2. Stadiul procesual \u2013 fond<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.3. Initiativa trimiterii \u2013 \u00a0din oficiu<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>II. \u00centrebarile preliminare publicate \u00een JO<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>III. Incidente procedurale \u0219i pledoarii la Curtea de Justi\u021bie<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IV. Prezentarea Concluziilor Avocatului General<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V. &nbsp;Pronun\u021barea Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea preliminar\u0103 sau ordonan\u021b\u0103 (motivat\u0103)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VI. Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea pronun\u021bat\u0103 de catre instan\u021ba na\u021bionala dup\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea preliminar\u0103<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VII. Bibliografie<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=3751\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Toate trimiterile preliminare formulate de instan\u021be din Rom\u00e2nia, \u00eenregistrate la Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>RoEULaw<\/strong>&nbsp;este un proiect realizat de Daniel-Mihail \u0218ANDRU, Drago\u0219-Alin C\u0102LIN \u0219i Constantin-Mihai BANU.&nbsp;<strong>RoEULaw<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2013 \u201e<em>interpretarea \u015fi aplicarea dreptului Uniunii<br>Europene de c\u0103tre instan\u0163ele din Rom\u00e2nia<\/em>\u201d&nbsp;este un proiect \u0219tiin\u021bific \u00een cadrul&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/\">Centrului de Studii de Drept European (CSDE) al Institutului de Cercetari Juridice \u201dAcad. Andrei R\u0103dulescu\u201d al Academiei Romane<\/a>&nbsp;\u00een colaborare cu&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro\/\">Asociatia Forumul Judecatorilor din Romania<\/a>. Proiectul are sus\u021binerea JURIDICE.ro<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,8,310,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5940","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cercetare","category-dreptul-european-al-afacerilor","category-romania-in-fata-curtii-de-justitie","category-romaniaeulaw-interpretarea-si-aplicarea-dreptului-uniunii-europene-de-catre-instantele-din-romania"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5940"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5940"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5940\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5941,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5940\/revisions\/5941"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}