{"id":5739,"date":"2025-12-30T09:57:00","date_gmt":"2025-12-30T07:57:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=5739"},"modified":"2025-12-16T21:07:57","modified_gmt":"2025-12-16T19:07:57","slug":"c-793-25-kedrion-pendinte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=5739","title":{"rendered":"C-793\/25, Kedrion, pendinte"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>C-793\/25, Kedrion, pendinte<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/liste.jsf?lgrec=fr&amp;td=;ALL&amp;language=en&amp;num=C-793\/25&amp;jur=C\">CURIA<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Trimitere preliminara formulata de \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie se refer\u0103 la interpretarea art. 101 TFUE.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Textul \u00eentreb\u0103rii preliminare potrivit \u00cencheierii din 27.11.2025 este urm\u0103torul:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201e<em>&nbsp;Articolul 101 TFUE poate fi interpretat \u00een sensul c\u0103 nu acoper\u0103 pretinse&nbsp;comportamente realizate pe fondul unei lipse a incertitudinii pe pia\u0163\u0103, respectiv,no\u0163iunea&nbsp;de practic\u0103 concertat\u0103 exclude coresponden\u0163a din cadrul unei asocia\u0163ii profesionale referitoare&nbsp;la o obliga\u0163ie fiscal\u0103 suplimentar\u0103 asupra industriei din care fac parte membrii asocia\u0163iei, \u00een&nbsp;condi\u0163iile \u00een care aceast\u0103 coresponden\u0163\u0103, referitoare la efectele notorii ale obliga\u0163iei fiscale, nu&nbsp;poate fi considerat\u0103 ca reduc\u00e2nd gradul de incertitudine specific mediului concuren\u0163\u00eeal normal?<\/em><em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Articolul 101 TFUE, dreptul la ap\u0103rare \u015fi principiul prezum\u0163iei de nevinov\u0103\u0163ie,&nbsp;consacrate \u00een art. 48 din Carta Drepturilor Fundamentale a Uniunii Europene, pot fi interpretate&nbsp;\u00een sensul c\u0103 pentru a \u00eendeplini \u00een mod corespunz\u0103tor sarcina probei, o autoritate de concuren\u0163\u0103 este obligat\u0103 s\u0103 \u00eenl\u0103ture \u00een mod expres, motivat \u015fi dovedit, \u00eendoiala cu privire la existen\u0163a unei&nbsp;practici concertate, \u00een cazul \u00een care unul dintre membrii asocia\u0163iei profesionale dovede\u015fte c\u0103 exist\u0103&nbsp;<strong>o&nbsp;<\/strong>explica\u0163ie alternativ\u0103 pentru retragerea produselor sale de pe pia\u0163\u0103?<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.1. Instanta na\u021bional\u0103 \u2013 ICCJ<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.2. Stadiul procesual \u2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.3. Initiativa trimiterii \u2013 &nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>II. \u00centrebarile preliminare publicate \u00een JO<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>III. Incidente procedurale \u0219i pledoarii la Curtea de Justi\u021bie \u2013 <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IV. Prezentarea Concluziilor Avocatului General<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V. &nbsp;Pronun\u021barea Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea preliminar\u0103 sau ordonan\u021b\u0103 (motivat\u0103)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VI. Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea pronun\u021bat\u0103 de catre instan\u021ba na\u021bionala dup\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea preliminar\u0103<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VII. Bibliografie<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=3751\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Toate trimiterile preliminare formulate de instan\u021be din Rom\u00e2nia, \u00eenregistrate la Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>RoEULaw<\/strong>&nbsp;este un proiect realizat de Daniel-Mihail \u0218ANDRU, Drago\u0219-Alin C\u0102LIN \u0219i Constantin-Mihai BANU.&nbsp;<strong>RoEULaw<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2013 \u201e<em>interpretarea \u015fi aplicarea dreptului Uniunii<br>Europene de c\u0103tre instan\u0163ele din Rom\u00e2nia<\/em>\u201d&nbsp;este un proiect \u0219tiin\u021bific \u00een cadrul&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/\">Centrului de Studii de Drept European (CSDE) al Institutului de Cercetari Juridice \u201dAcad. Andrei R\u0103dulescu\u201d al Academiei Romane<\/a>&nbsp;\u00een colaborare cu&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro\/\">Asociatia Forumul Judecatorilor din Romania<\/a>. Proiectul are sus\u021binerea JURIDICE.ro<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5739","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cercetare","category-romaniaeulaw-interpretarea-si-aplicarea-dreptului-uniunii-europene-de-catre-instantele-din-romania"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5739"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5739"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5739\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5740,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5739\/revisions\/5740"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5739"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5739"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}