{"id":5355,"date":"2025-03-06T11:44:00","date_gmt":"2025-03-06T09:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=5355"},"modified":"2025-03-08T00:00:07","modified_gmt":"2025-03-07T22:00:07","slug":"c-15-25-casa-judeteana-de-pensii-cluj-tribunalul-cluj-a-formulat-o-trimitere-preliminara-privind-interpetarea-art-2-si-a-art-19-tue-oug-nr-62-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=5355","title":{"rendered":"C-15\/25,\u00a0Casa Jude\u0163ean\u0103 de Pensii Cluj &#8211; Tribunalul Cluj a formulat o trimitere preliminara privind interpetarea art. 2 \u0219i a art. 19 TUE (OUG nr. 62\/2024)."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>C-15\/25,\u00a0Casa Jude\u0163ean\u0103 de Pensii Cluj, pendinte<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tribunalul Cluj a formulat o trimitere preliminara privind interpetarea art. 2 \u0219i a art. 19 TUE (OUG nr. 62\/2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cauza a fost \u00eenregistrat\u0103 la CJUE: <a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/liste.jsf?lgrec=fr&amp;td=;ALL&amp;language=en&amp;num=C-15\/25&amp;jur=C\">C-15\/25,\u00a0Casa Jude\u0163ean\u0103 de Pensii Cluj, pendinte<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Potrivit\u00a0rejust, Tribunalul Cluj a formulat urmatoarea intrebare preliminara:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201eArticolul 2 TUE, Articolul 19 alineatul (1) al doilea paragraf TUE (cu referire la articolul 2 TUE \u015fi art. 47 din carta drepturilor fundamentale) trebuie interpretate \u00een sensul c\u0103 principiul independen\u0163ei judec\u0103torilor se opune unei reglement\u0103ri na\u0163ionale care instituie obliga\u0163ia completurilor de judecat\u0103 care solu\u0163ioneaz\u0103 procesele privind stabilirea \u015fi\/sau plata drepturilor salariale sau de natur\u0103 salarial\u0103 ale personalului pl\u0103tit din fonduri publice, s\u0103 solicite \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie, \u00een toate cauzele pe care le au de decis, pronun\u0163area unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri prealabile privind chestiuni de drept nesolu\u0163ionate anterior de instan\u0163a suprem\u0103, diminu\u00e2nd \u00een acest fel capacitatea judec\u0103torilor \u00eenvesti\u0163i cu dosarele respective de a solu\u0163iona cauzele \u00een mod autonom exclusiv pe considerentul c\u0103 practica judiciar\u0103 neunitar\u0103 poate avea un impact negativ asupra bugetului general consolidat \u015fi stabilit\u0103\u0163ii socio-economice a \u0163\u0103rii?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.1. Instanta na\u021bional\u0103 \u2013\u00a0 Tribunalul Cluj<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.2. Stadiul procesual \u2013 fond<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.3. Initiativa trimiterii \u2013 p\u0103r\u021bile<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>II. \u00centrebarile preliminare publicate \u00een JO<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>III. Incidente procedurale \u0219i pledoarii la Curtea de Justi\u021bie<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IV. Prezentarea Concluziilor Avocatului General<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V. &nbsp;Pronun\u021barea Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea preliminar\u0103 sau ordonan\u021b\u0103 (motivat\u0103)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VI. Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea pronun\u021bat\u0103 de catre instan\u021ba na\u021bionala dup\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea preliminar\u0103<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VII. Bibliografie<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=3751\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Toate trimiterile preliminare formulate de instan\u021be din Rom\u00e2nia, \u00eenregistrate la Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>RoEULaw<\/strong>&nbsp;este un proiect realizat de Daniel-Mihail \u0218ANDRU, Drago\u0219-Alin C\u0102LIN \u0219i Constantin-Mihai BANU.&nbsp;<strong>RoEULaw<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2013 \u201e<em>interpretarea \u015fi aplicarea dreptului Uniunii Europene de c\u0103tre instan\u0163ele din Rom\u00e2nia<\/em>\u201d&nbsp;este un proiect \u0219tiin\u021bific \u00een cadrul&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/\">Centrului de Studii de Drept European (CSDE) al Institutului de Cercetari Juridice \u201dAcad. Andrei R\u0103dulescu\u201d al Academiei Romane<\/a>&nbsp;\u00een colaborare cu&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro\/\">Asociatia Forumul Judecatorilor din Romania<\/a>. Proiectul are sus\u021binerea JURIDICE.ro<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-romaniaeulaw-interpretarea-si-aplicarea-dreptului-uniunii-europene-de-catre-instantele-din-romania"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5355"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5355"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5355\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5358,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5355\/revisions\/5358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}