{"id":5330,"date":"2025-03-06T08:22:00","date_gmt":"2025-03-06T06:22:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=5330"},"modified":"2025-03-07T23:27:19","modified_gmt":"2025-03-07T21:27:19","slug":"c-172-25-personal-sea-management-trimitere-preliminara-a-curtii-de-apeel-constanta-referitoare-la-interpretarea-directivei-2008-104-privind-munca-prin-agent-de-munca-temporara","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=5330","title":{"rendered":"C-172\/25, Personal Sea Management &#8211; trimitere preliminara a Curtii de Apeel Constanta referitoare la interpretarea Directivei 2008\/104 privind munca prin agent de munca temporara"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>C-172\/25, Personal Sea Management &#8211;<a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/liste.jsf?lgrec=fr&amp;td=;ALL&amp;language=en&amp;num=C-172\/25&amp;jur=C\">site CURIA<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Curtea de Apel Constanta a formulat o trimitere preliminara referitoare la interpretarea Directivei 2008\/104 privind munca prin agent de munca temporara<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cauza a fost \u00eenregistrat\u0103 la CJUE: C-172\/25, pendinte<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Potrivit incheierii din <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rejust.ro\/juris\/eeg2d6887\">rejust.ro<\/a> textul intrebarilor preliminare este urmatorul:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201eArticolul 5 al.1 corelat cu articolul 2 din Directiva 2008\/104, privind \u201ePrincipiul egalit\u0103\u0163ii de tratament\u201d, trebuie interpretat \u00een sensul c\u0103 se opune unei reglement\u0103ri na\u0163ionale, care prevede ca motiv de \u00eencetare a contractului individual de munc\u0103 al lucr\u0103torului angajat de o agen\u0163ie de munc\u0103 temporar\u0103 renun\u0163area utilizatorului la serviciile lucr\u0103torului, \u00een condi\u0163iile \u00een care aceast\u0103 renun\u0163are nu trebuie justificat\u0103 \u00een nici un mod \u015fi nu este supus\u0103 vreunei condi\u0163ii de form\u0103, iar pentru agen\u0163ia de munc\u0103 temporar\u0103 aceast\u0103 renun\u0163are \u00een sine constituie un motiv suficient pentru concediere \u00een timp ce, dac\u0103 utilizatorul ar fi angajat el \u00eensu\u015fi acel lucr\u0103tor, ar fi fost supus unor exigen\u0163e legale privind justificarea motivului concedierii \u015fi condi\u0163iile de form\u0103 ale actului de concediere?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.1. Instanta na\u021bional\u0103 \u2013&nbsp; Curtea de Apel Constanta<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.2. Stadiul procesual \u2013 recurs<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I.3. Initiativa trimiterii \u2013 oficiu<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>II. \u00centrebarile preliminare publicate \u00een JO<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>III. Incidente procedurale \u0219i pledoarii la Curtea de Justi\u021bie<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IV. Prezentarea Concluziilor Avocatului General<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V. &nbsp;Pronun\u021barea Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea preliminar\u0103 sau ordonan\u021b\u0103 (motivat\u0103)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VI. Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea pronun\u021bat\u0103 de catre instan\u021ba na\u021bionala dup\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea preliminar\u0103<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VII. Bibliografie<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/?p=3751\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Toate trimiterile preliminare formulate de instan\u021be din Rom\u00e2nia, \u00eenregistrate la Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>RoEULaw<\/strong>&nbsp;este un proiect realizat de Daniel-Mihail \u0218ANDRU, Drago\u0219-Alin C\u0102LIN \u0219i Constantin-Mihai BANU.&nbsp;<strong>RoEULaw<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2013 \u201e<em>interpretarea \u015fi aplicarea dreptului Uniunii Europene de c\u0103tre instan\u0163ele din Rom\u00e2nia<\/em>\u201d&nbsp;este un proiect \u0219tiin\u021bific \u00een cadrul&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/\">Centrului de Studii de Drept European (CSDE) al Institutului de Cercetari Juridice \u201dAcad. Andrei R\u0103dulescu\u201d al Academiei Romane<\/a>&nbsp;\u00een colaborare cu&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro\/\">Asociatia Forumul Judecatorilor din Romania<\/a>. Proiectul are sus\u021binerea JURIDICE.ro<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,310,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5330","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cercetare","category-romania-in-fata-curtii-de-justitie","category-romaniaeulaw-interpretarea-si-aplicarea-dreptului-uniunii-europene-de-catre-instantele-din-romania"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5330"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5330"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5330\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5340,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5330\/revisions\/5340"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5330"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5330"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5330"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}