Revista Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Drept Comunitar, nr. 1\/2010<\/b><\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n
DOCTRIN\u0102<\/b><\/p>\n
Michal Bobek<\/b>, Despre aplicarea dreptului european (nu doar) \u00een instan\u0163ele noilor state membre: \u201eNu faci dup\u0103 cum spun\u201d?<\/i><\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n
Abstract:<\/p>\n
This contribution firstly summarises some of the requirements the case
\nlaw of the Court of Justice imposes upon national judges when applying
\nEC law. Second, a realistic assessment of the judicial capacity in
\nthese areas is provided, with (where possible) some examples from the
\ncase law of the new Member States. Finally, broader conclusions are
\ndrawn concerning the capacities and strategies of national courts in
\nthe domestic application of EC law, including some of the inspirations
\nwhich the European legal order may draw from game theory.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n
Mariolina Eliantonio, Nelly Stratieva<\/b>, From Plaumann, through UPA and J\u00e9go-Qu\u00e9r\u00e9, to the Lisbon Treaty: The Locus Standi of Private Applicants under Article 230(4) EC through a Political Lens<\/i><\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n
Abstract<\/b>:<\/p>\n
The current rules of standing for non-privileged applicants under Article 230(4) EC are at the core of an ongoing debate because of the restrictive interpretation given to these rules by the European Court of Justice. This paper reviews the <\/i>locus standi conditions for private applicants, the fundamental case law on this issue and the failed attempts to reform the current system. Furthermore, building upon the conceptual framework of rational-choice and historical institutionalism, the paper presents possible explanations for the reluctance of the ECJ to substantially reform its restrictive approach to <\/i>locus standi.<\/i><\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n
Brigitta Lurger<\/b>, Notarii \u015fi libert\u0103\u0163ile fundamentale \u2013 C\u00e2t de departe se \u00eentind grani\u0163ele pie\u0163ei interne?<\/i><\/p>\n
Abstract:<\/p>\n
The action for failure to fulfil obligations brought by the European Commission against Austria and other seven Member States to the European Court of Justice concerning the nationality requirement imposed for notaries public has reached the final stage. In case the Court will conclude that the profession of notary public is not connected with the exercise of official authority under Article 45 EC, then the Member States concerned might be under a duty to perform an extensive reform of their legal systems. The present paper supports the thesis that such an outcome would be possible only on a basis of an erroneous reading of the EU law.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n
Anamaria Groza<\/b>, Trimiterile preliminare \u00een situa\u0163ii pur interne<\/i><\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n
Abstract:<\/b><\/p>\n
The article deals the way in which the Court of Justice has tackled the purely internal situations by means of preliminary rulings. The Court used that instrument in order to rule on the impact of restrictive national measures which were brought to its attention by questions sent by the national courts, about the settlement and functioning of the Internal Market. The preliminary rulings have contributed to a reduction of the purely internal situations to cases that did not have a connection factor with the Community law, but which had the risk to generate in the future obstacles for the use of the freedoms specific for the Internal Market. At present, the preliminary rulings are admissible in case the main proceedings represent a purely internal situation, provided the law of the European Union is deemed as applicable by an internal norm or by taking over its content of internal norm. However, the Court delivered preliminary rulings without verifying that condition, presuming that the national court who addressed the question had previously checked and ascertained that the internal law forbad reverse discrimination, and the answer he required to the Court was necessary and useful in order to solve the main proceedings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Diana Ungureanu<\/b>, Cartea alb\u0103 privind ac\u0163iunile \u00een desp\u0103gubire pentru cazurile de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a normelor CE antitrust<\/i><\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n
Abstract:<\/b><\/p>\n
As the European Commissioner for Competition policy, Neelie Kroes, admitted in her public speeches, businesses and consumers in Europe lose billions of euros each and every year as a result of companies breaking EU antitrust rules. These individuals have a right to compensation through an effective system that complements public enforcement, whilst avoiding excessive burdens and abuses. <\/em><\/em><\/p>\n Facilitating damages claims for breaches of the antitrust rules will not only strengthen the enforcement of competition law, but will also make it easier for consumers and businesses who have suffered damage from an infringement of competition law rules to recover their losses from the infringer.<\/i><\/p>\n The Commission is therefore looking at the conditions under which private parties can bring actions for damages before the national courts of the Member States for breach of the Community antitrust rules.<\/i><\/p>\n In the majority of Member States actions for damages for the infringement of EC and national competition law have been extremely limited. In Europe, competition law is mostly enforced by competition agencies, subject to review by the courts. Awards for damages by national courts at the initiative of private parties are much less common<\/i><\/p>\n On 19 December 2005, the Commission published for public consultation a Green Paper<\/a> and a Commission staff working paper<\/a> on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules. The purpose of the said Green Paper was to stimulate the debate and also a feedback from stakeholders on a number of possible options which could facilitate private damages actions.<\/i><\/p>\n On 3 April 2008, the Commission published a White Paper<\/a> and a Commission Staff Working Paper<\/a> on Damages Actions for Breach of the EC antitrust rules. The White Paper suggests specific policy choices and measures that would help give all victims of infringements of EC competition law access to effective redress mechanisms so that they can be fully compensated for the harm they suffered. The White Paper is based on an impact assessment<\/a>. The consultation to the public was open until the 15th July 2008.<\/i><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n Amelia Raluca Bu\u015fc\u0103<\/b>, Principii generale privind coordonarea sistemelor de securitate social\u0103 \u00een lumina Regulamentului 883\/2004<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Abstract<\/b>:<\/p>\n This paper intends to examine the general principles of the social security coordination system in the light of Regulation 883\/2004, applicable from the 1st May 2010, using comparison with Regulation 1408\/71.<\/i><\/p>\n After a proper analysis of the fundamental rules depicted by Regulation 883\/2004, no substantial modification is detected, which confirms the conclusion that the main objective of drafting and adopting new rules in this field was the simplification and modernisation of a system conceived in a period with different economic, social and demographic realities.<\/i><\/p>\n The fundamental principles imposed by Regulation 883\/2004 were composed by adaptation of the restructuring provisions, simplified and adjusted. Nevertheless, many of the rules under review, although formally modified, disappoint after a detailed analysis. This is the case of the ratione personae scope, which is now consistent with the European citizenship and with the new aspects arising from the freedom of movement and the equality of treatment, however without innovation in practice. Regulation 1408\/71 is still applicable in respect of the third countries nationals, because the new regulation ignored the issue despite the obvious advantages of norms approximation and of avoiding the complex situations in practice.<\/i><\/p>\n The ratione materiae scope was extended only regarding the paternity and pre-pension benefits, which is not sufficient in respect of the actual social needs and the national evolutions in the field of social security.<\/i><\/p>\n The other principles were equally without remarkable changes. However, it is often considered that, regarding the equality treatment and the exportability rule, no substantial changes are necessary. Notwithstanding, one should note the strengthening of the non-discrimination rule by generalisation arisen from the assimilation of facts disposition. <\/i><\/p>\n Although innovations proposed by Commission were in certain aspects limited or put aside, the new Regulation may efficiently contribute to the forward development of the social security coordination and may offer a proper starting point for the ECJ case-law.<\/i><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n DOSAR: SOCIETATEA ROM\u00c2N\u0102 DE DREPT COMUNITAR<\/b><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Bogdan M\u0103noiu<\/b>, Priorit\u0103\u0163ile Rom\u00e2niei la UE \u00een 2010<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n Nicolae Idu<\/b>, Ghidul Tratatului de la Lisabona<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n Ion M. Anghel, <\/b>Tratatul de la Lisabona. Reperele lui definitorii<\/i><\/p>\n <\/p>\n JURISPRUDEN\u0162A INSTAN\u0162ELOR COMUNITARE<\/b><\/p>\n (selec\u0163ie \u015fi comentarii realizate de Mihai Banu<\/b>)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Modalit\u0103\u0163i de utilizare a produselor \u015fi m\u0103suri cu efect echivalent<\/b><\/p>\n I. Ne\u00eendeplinirea obliga\u0163iilor de c\u0103tre un stat membru. <\/b>Articolul 28 CE. No\u0163iunea \u00abm\u0103suri cu efect echivalent restric\u0163iilor cantitative la import\u00bb. Interdic\u0163ia pentru motorete, motociclete, tricicluri \u015fi cvadricicluri de a tracta o remorc\u0103 pe teritoriul unui stat membru. Siguran\u0163\u0103 rutier\u0103. Acces pe pia\u0163\u0103. Obstacol. Propor\u0163ionalitate<\/b> (CJCE, Marea Camer\u0103, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea din 10 februarie 2009, cauza C-110\/05, Comisia\/Republica Italian\u0103<\/i>, nepublicat\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 \u00een Rep.)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n II. Directiva 94\/25\/CE. Apropierea legisla\u0163iilor. Ambarca\u0163iuni de agrement. Interdic\u0163ie privind utilizarea motovehiculelor nautice \u00een afara culoarelor publice de naviga\u0163ie. Articolele 28 CE \u015fi 30 CE. M\u0103suri cu efect echivalent. Acces pe pia\u0163\u0103. Obstacol. Protec\u0163ia mediului. Propor\u0163ionalitate<\/b> (CJCE, Camera a doua, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea din 4 iunie 2009, cauza C-142\/05, \u00c5klagaren\/Mickelsson<\/i> \u015fi<\/i> Roos<\/i>, nepublicat\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 \u00een Rep.)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Compatibilitatea cu Tratatul CE a unor acorduri bilaterale privind investi\u0163iile \u00eencheiate de state membre cu \u0163\u0103ri ter\u0163e<\/b><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Ne\u00eendeplinirea obliga\u0163iilor de c\u0103tre un stat membru. \u00cenc\u0103lcarea articolului 307 al doilea paragraf CE. Neadoptarea de m\u0103suri corespunz\u0103toare pentru a elimina incompatibilit\u0103\u0163ile dintre acordurile bilaterale \u00eencheiate cu \u0163\u0103ri ter\u0163e \u00eenainte de aderarea statului membru la Uniunea European\u0103 \u015fi Tratatul CE. Acorduri \u00een domeniul investi\u0163iilor \u00eencheiate de Republica Austria cu Republica Coreea, Republica Capului Verde, Republica Popular\u0103 Chinez\u0103, Malaezia, Federa\u0163ia Rus\u0103 \u015fi Republica Turcia<\/b> (CJCE, Marea Camer\u0103, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea din 3 martie 2009, cauza C-205\/06, Comisia\/Republica Austria<\/i>, nepublicat\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 \u00een Rep.)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Ne\u00eendeplinirea obliga\u0163iilor de c\u0103tre un stat membru. \u00cenc\u0103lcarea articolului 307 al doilea paragraf CE. Neadoptarea de m\u0103suri corespunz\u0103toare pentru a elimina incompatibilit\u0103\u0163ile dintre acordurile bilaterale \u00eencheiate cu \u0163\u0103ri ter\u0163e \u00eenainte de aderarea statului membru la Uniunea European\u0103 \u015fi Tratatul CE. Acorduri \u00een domeniul investi\u0163iilor \u00eencheiate de Regatul Suediei cu Republica Argentina, Republica Bolivia, Republica C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire, Republica Arab\u0103 Egipt, Hong Kong, Republica Indonezia, Republica Popular\u0103 Chinez\u0103, Republica Madagascar, Malaezia, Republica Islamic\u0103 Pakistan, Republica Peru, Republica Senegal, Republica Democrat\u0103 Socialist\u0103 Sri Lanka, Republica Tunisian\u0103, Republica Socialist\u0103 Vietnam, Republica Yemen \u015fi fosta Republic\u0103 Socialist\u0103 Federativ\u0103 Iugoslavia <\/b>(CJCE, Marea Camer\u0103, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea din 3 martie 2009, cauza C-249\/06, Comisia\/Regatul Suediei<\/i>, nepublicat\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 \u00een Rep.)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Ne\u00eendeplinirea obliga\u0163iilor de c\u0103tre un stat membru. Articolul 307 al doilea paragraf CE. Neadoptarea unor m\u0103suri corespunz\u0103toare pentru a elimina incompatibilit\u0103\u0163ile dintre acordurile bilaterale \u00eencheiate cu state ter\u0163e \u00eenainte de aderarea statului membru la Uniunea European\u0103 \u015fi Tratatul CE. Acorduri bilaterale \u00een domeniul investi\u0163iilor \u00eencheiate de Republica Finlanda cu Federa\u0163ia Rus\u0103, cu Republica Belarus, cu Republica Popular\u0103 Chinez\u0103, cu Malaysia, cu Republica Socialist\u0103 Democratic\u0103 Sri Lanka \u015fi cu Republica Uzbekistan<\/b> (CJCE, Camera a doua, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea din 19 noiembrie 2009, cauza C\u2011118\/07, Comisia\/Republica Finlanda<\/i>, nepublicat\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 \u00een Rep.)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n ACTIVITATEA CENTRULUI DE STUDII DE DREPT EUROPEAN (CSDE)<\/b><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n Raportul CSDE pentru 2009 – CENTRUL DE STUDII DE DREPT EUROPEAN, Institutul de Cercet\u0103ri Juridice<\/b> \u201eAcad. Andrei R\u0103dulescu<\/i>\u201d, al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne<\/b><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n Centrul de Studii de Drept European (CSDE) a organizat Conferin\u0163a interna\u0163ional\u0103 \u00abRaporturi \u00eentre instan\u0163ele constitu\u0163ionale na\u0163ionale \u015fi dreptul Uniunii Europene: dou\u0103 exemple recente (decizia Bundesverfassungsgericht privind Tratatul de la Lisabona \u015fi decizia CCR privind Legea p\u0103str\u0103rii datelor)<\/i>\u00bb, la data de 4 februarie 2010, la sediul Institutului de Cerce\u0103ri Juridice al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Centrul de Studii de Drept European (CSDE) al Institutului de Cercet\u0103ri Juridice \u201eAcad. Andrei R\u0103dulescu\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne a organizat \u00een data de 12 februarie 2010, la sediul s\u0103u din Calea 13 Septembrie, nr. 13, conferin\u0163a cu tema Realiz\u0103rile Tribunalului Uniunii Europene \u00een primele dou\u0103 decenii de func\u0163ionare \u015fi perspectivele acestei instan\u0163e, <\/i>sus\u0163inut\u0103\u00a0 de c\u0103tre Prof. univ. dr. Valerius Ciuc\u0103, judec\u0103tor \u2013 Tribunalul Uniunii Europene<\/i>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Redactor \u015eef<\/p>\n Conf. univ. dr. Daniel-Mihail \u015eandru<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,18,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2496","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-autori-si-conferentiari","category-publicatii","category-revista-romana-de-drept-european-publicatii"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2496"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2496"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2496\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2498,"href":"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2496\/revisions\/2498"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2496"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2496"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.csde.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2496"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}